Delight Is Overrated. Great UX Gets Out of the Way

Saad Benryane

In the world of digital products, the word “delight” gets thrown around like confetti. Designers talk about it. Product teams chase it. Stakeholders demand it. But here’s the hard truth: Delight is a byproduct. Good UX is about decision reduction. The most successful user experiences don’t dazzle. They don’t dance.They don’t make users think, guess, or evaluate.They simply disappear. When a product “just works,” it doesn’t feel delightful.It feels obvious. Effortless. Almost boring in the best possible way. And that’s the point.

📌 TLDR : UX Beyond Delight ✅ One decision per screen : Prevent overwhelm and competing priorities ✅ Smart defaults : Save mental energy, reduce friction ✅ Progressive disclosure : Hide complexity until it’s relevant ✅ Curated choices : More clarity, fewer regrets ✅ Guided flows : Step-by-step support for user momentum

Decision Fatigue Is Real and flashy UX Makes It Worse

We make an estimated 35,000 decisions every day. Most of them are unconscious, trivial, and fast.
But each one consumes mental energy. The more decisions we face, even minor ones, the more our cognitive capacity depletes.

This is what psychologists call decision fatigue.

It’s been studied across disciplines:

  • Judges give less favorable rulings as the day progresses.

  • Shoppers make more impulsive purchases late in the day.

  • People are more likely to stick with defaults when overloaded.

In the context of product design, every dropdown, modal, button, or fork in the road adds to this cognitive load.

If your user has to stop and think, you've added friction.

We may assume more options = more empowerment. But the inverse is often true: more options lead to more paralysis, more second-guessing, and more drop-offs.

The UX Laws of Decision-Making

🔹 Hick’s Law

Hick’s Law states that the time it takes to make a decision increases logarithmically with the number of options presented.

Put simply: more choices = slower decisions.

It’s why menus with 20 items feel paralyzing, while 3–5 curated options invite confident action.

🔹 The Paradox of Choice

Psychologist Barry Schwartz demonstrated that offering too many choices actually reduces satisfaction.
People feel more regret, more FOMO, and less clarity — even after making a “good” decision.

🔹 Cognitive Load Theory

The human brain can only hold 7±2 items in short-term memory.
Presenting 10+ choices, complicated forms, or unclear flows overwhelms this limit quickly.

All of this points to one key truth:

The job of UX is not to increase freedom, it’s to reduce cognitive taxation.

Five Core UX Principles to Reduce Decisions

Analyze your product against these principles and uncover all the friction you can remove.

✅ 1. Focus Each Screen on a Single Decision

Every screen should ask the user to do one thing.

Is it signing up? Choosing a plan? Booking a slot?

Avoid competing CTAs or split objectives.
Simplicity isn’t minimalism — it’s prioritization.

✅ 2. Use Smart Defaults and Prefills

Make the best or most common option the default.
Pre-fill what you know. Carry over previous answers.

Great products don’t ask users to repeat themselves.

Default design isn’t lazy — it’s respectful of time and focus.

✅ 3. Reveal Complexity Gradually

Apply progressive disclosure. Let users dive deeper only when needed.

Advanced filters? Hidden.
Extra settings? Behind a toggle.
Details? Below the fold.

Show less at first. Reveal more later. Confidence builds when clarity leads.

✅ 4. Curate Options Ruthlessly

Give users fewer but better choices. Not 10 shipping speeds, but 3. Not 17 pricing plans, instead, show 3 clear pricing tiers.

This isn’t about limiting power. It’s about boosting clarity.

As a rule: if you need to explain the difference between two options, you probably need fewer options.

✅ 5. Design Decision Funnels, Not Decision Walls

Instead of confronting users with everything at once, guide them step-by-step:

  • Step 1: What type of user are you?

  • Step 2: What do you want to do?

  • Step 3: Here’s what we recommend.

When a user sees a clear path, their brain relaxes.
They follow, instead of evaluate.

Real-World Examples of Decision-Reducing UX

🍿 Netflix

You’re not shown 10,000 titles.
You’re shown 5–7 personalized rows like “Because You Watched,” “Trending Now,” “Top Picks for You.”

Curation over catalog.
Suggested, not searched.
You didn’t choose from a wall, you responded to a nudge.

💳 Stripe Checkout

Stripe strips away noise:

  • One clean form

  • Autofilled fields

  • Apple Pay / Google Pay detection

  • One CTA: Pay Now

There’s no room for friction. It’s all been shaved away.

🍏 Apple Setup

Apple’s onboarding is a masterclass in progressive UX:

  • Key settings up front

  • Less relevant options grouped or deferred

  • Smart defaults applied automatically

You glide through a complex configuration without realizing how much has been decided for you, and that’s precisely the brilliance.

So… Is Delight Useless?

Absolutely not. But it’s not the foundation, it’s the polish.

Delight isn’t a dancing button or animated unicorn.
It’s the emotion that emerges when something feels effortless.

It comes after clarity. After ease. After trust.

Real delight is the moment a user says:
“I can’t believe how easy that was.”

A Note from the Past: Dieter Rams Got Here First

Long before digital UX was a field, Dieter Rams—the legendary industrial designer behind Braun—set forth his famous Ten Principles of Good Design.

One of them stands out:

“Good design is as little design as possible.”

Rams didn’t mean minimal for the sake of aesthetics.
He meant that design should not draw attention to itself.
Its job is to get out of the way—so the product’s function becomes self-evident.

That’s exactly what great UX does.

It doesn’t dazzle.
It disappears.

Design, when done right, fades into clarity.

Apple (where Rams’ influence is obvious) embraced this fully: fewer buttons, fewer choices, smarter defaults, and interfaces that reduce decision-making at every touchpoint.

His vision still holds up—perhaps more today than ever.

Test Where Your Users Are Forced to Decide

In usability tests, watch for:

  • Pauses

  • Repeated questions

  • Scanning back and forth

  • “Wait… do I need this?”

  • Hovering over multiple options

  • People defaulting to the safest but suboptimal choice

These are decision points. Your job is to eliminate them—or make them invisible.

Final Thought: Design for Confidence, Not Control

People don’t want more control.
They want to feel smart, safe, and certain.

The best UX doesn’t say “Here are 15 ways you can do this.”
It says “Here’s what we recommend. You’re in good hands.”

And that’s where real trust is built.

Simplicity isn’t lack of ambition.
It’s precision in intent.

Stay in the Loop

Join a community of forward-thinkers and get my latest thoughts, updates, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Unsubscribe at any time.

Stay in the Loop

Join a community of forward-thinkers and get my latest thoughts, updates, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Unsubscribe at any time.

Black and white portrait of a man with a beard and glasses

Saad Benryane

Product & Growth Partner

Contact

Fill out the form, or reach out directly. I’ll respond within 24 hours.

© Saad Benryane — All rights reserved

Black and white portrait of a man with a beard and glasses

Saad Benryane

Product & Growth Partner

Contact

Fill out the form, or reach out directly. I’ll respond within 24 hours.

© Saad Benryane — All rights reserved